News

Press Releases

Top

June 2, 2010

AGRICULTURE DEFENSE COALITION

PRESS RELEASE

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY ARM CAMPAIGN

BEGINS JUNE 2, 2010 IN CALIFORNIA

Carbonaceous Aerosols and Radiative Effects Study (CARES)

CALIFORNIA EPA CalNex CA ARB AIR RESOUCRES CAMPAIGN MAY – JUNE 2010

Contact: Rosalind Peterson, President

Agriculture Defense Coalition

Post Office Box 499

Redwood Valley, CA 95470

(707) 485-7520

E-Mail: info@californiaskywatch.com

The major concerns about the U.S. Department of Energy, ARM CARES campaign which will take place in California during the month of June are outlined below. It should be noted that when the NASA ARTCAS campaign and the California ARB joined forces for any air quality investigation in June 2008, one major area of focus was on forest fire pollution. Many California residents alleged that the highly unusual lightning in Northern California on June 19-20, 2008, was part of a man-made lightning experiment.

The Agriculture Defense Coalition alleges that this new ARM Campaign is being conducted at a time of year when California is rarely subject to forest fires. Thus, there are concerns that government, university, military or private companies will conduct lightning experiments in California to satisfy the second of the two objectives of the costly ARM campaign:

The second objective during ARM CARES campaign will be to take advantage of natural wildfires in the vicinity to study the evolution and properties of biomass burning aerosols. Occurrence of natural wildfires is very likely all over the Central Valley during June/July. Thus, the location and timing of the CARES 2010 campaign will allow ARM researchers to target such an opportunity when it arises.

The Agriculture Defense Coalition and its members are requesting an investigation into these U.S. Department of Energy and California ARB Campaigns at this time. Our members will be contacting the press, these participating agencies, and our elected officials with regard to these issues.

We encourage the public to also request and investigation in order to protect California residents from toxic tracer gases, other types of atmospheric campaign releases, and any lightning or other types of experiments that would cause forest fires or other public and environmental hazards. Also investigations should be conducted into other chemicals being found in drinking water supplies throughout the State.

BACKGROUND: On June 2, 2010, the U.S. Department of Energy ARM (Atmospheric Radiation Measurement) Campaign and CARES Study will begin, in conjunction with the California Air Resources Campaign that is already underway in California. The ARM month long campaign involves many different government agencies like NASA and NOAA, universities, and also U.S. Department of Defense Pacific Northwest National Laboratory (PNNL). The sampling strategy during CARES will be coordinated, to the extent possible, with CalNex 2010, a major field campaign that is now ongoing in California by the California Air Resources Board (CARB), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and the California Energy Commission (CEC). ARM will collaborate with the California Energy Commission and investigators from the California Air Resources Board.

The primary objective of the ARM CARES campaign is to investigate and study the ways in which carbonaceous atmospheric aerosols evolve, move and affect climate. A primary objective of the program is improved scientific understanding of the fundamental physics related to interactions between clouds and radiative feedback processes in the atmosphere.

The second objective during CARES will be to take advantage of natural wildfires in the vicinity to study the evolution and properties of biomass burning aerosols. Occurrence of natural wildfires is very likely all over the Central Valley during June/July. Thus, the location and timing of the CARES 2010 campaign will allow ARM researchers to target such an opportunity when it arises.

The reasons for the California CalNex and the ARM campaigns are interesting for the following reasons:

• 1) On June 19, 2008, at the beginning of the CA ARB and NASA ARCTAS campaigns, lightning induced massive forest fires were started in California, and were intensely studied during the time frame.


• 2) Many allege that the lighting was part of a lightning experiment that was conducted over Northern California between June 19-20, 2008.


• 3) The worst time to study pollutants in California is during the month of May and June when air quality is very good.


• 4) Agriculture, backyard, and fireplace burning in the month of June is rare as most of this type of activity takes place in November – March each year. Inversions are more likely to occur in Sacramento, Mendocino and other California Counties between November and February.


• 5) Forest fires are rare anywhere in California in during the months of May and June/July. Thus, the CARES study should be conducted during the heavy fire season months in California which are in late August though the first rains in November or December.

This leads to the following questions and conclusions:

• A) Will any government, university, or military lighting experiments be conducted over California in order to be able to justify the second fire objective of the ARM CARES study?


• B) Studying air quality and the way carbonaceous atmospheric aerosols evolve, move and affect climate when the air quality is good but why conduct them when there are no winter atmospheric inversions taking place and massive pollution from agriculture burning?


• C) Any study regarding air quality should involve testing for a wide range of particulates and sizes which are found in California all year around not just during the months when air pollution is at its lowest levels and windy conditions prevail on most afternoons.


• D) CalNex and ARM research and studies should include aluminum coated fiberglass (Chaff), Aluminum particulates, aluminum oxide from the U.S. Navy CARE Experiment, and other types of chemicals which are also found in California air and water tests (Strontium, calcium, barium, aluminum, boron, salts, and chemicals from experimental Weather Modification programs in California NOAA records) and other upper atmospheric releases. It should be noted that there is aluminum, other particles and toxics in rocket fuel along with the pollution from jet fuel emissions-both commercial and military.


• E) The ARM and CalNex studies should also closely examine the NASA Studies regarding man-made clouds that cause climate change and their relationship to the many different types and sizes of particulates and chemical air pollution in California, since climate data is one of the major CalNex and ARM objectives:

Note: NASA research studies show that increasingly persistent jet contrails may turn into man-made clouds (or white haze), that are “…trapping warmth in the atmosphere and exacerbating global warming…” NASA (2005), goes on to state that “…Any change in global cloud cover may contribute to long-term changes in the Earth’s climate. Contrails, especially persistent contrails, represent a human-caused increase in the Earth’s cloudiness, and are likely to be affecting climate and ultimately our natural resources…”

Note: According to ARM CARES documents the 72-hour weather “… forecasts are generated nightly using WRF-Chem with tracers (how toxic and which tracers will be used), emitted from 20 sub-regions within California that represent important emission regions that could impact flight planning for the campaign. The 20 regions…are based on a threshold carbon monoxide emission rate within each region of interest. The diurnal cycle and emission rates for the tracers are determined from the carbon monoxide emissions in a California Air Resources Board emissions dataset that was developed for the NASA ARCTAS campaign during the summer of 2008…” (Please note that the carbon monoxide emissions in the dataset from CA ARB and the ARCTAS Campaign in California may show abnormal results due to the lightning induced forest fires that raged in California during the summer of 2008, along with particulates, aerosols, normal air pollution, and smoke from the fires.)

The Agriculture Defense Coalition and its members are requesting an investigation into these U.S. Department of Energy and California ARB Campaigns at this time. Our members will be contacting the press, these agencies, and our elected officials with regard to these campaigns.

We encourage the public to also request and investigation in order to protect California residents from toxic tracer gases, other types of atmospheric campaign releases, and any lightning or other types of experiments that would cause forest fires or other hazards.

In addition, we encourage the California Air Resources Board to conduct extensive chemical and air quality monitoring throughout California at all times of the year in every county due to the amount of air pollution, man-made clouds, and white haze that is found almost everywhere in California. It is time to address air quality issues from all sources in California and their impact on climate, public health, and the environment. The California Air Resources Board should also study the impact of weather modification programs on clouds and rainfall within California considering the number, scope of experiments, and type of chemicals that are used in these programs.

The United States Navy is conducting a 5-Year Warfare Testing Program in Southern California. The State of California ARB and ARM should be conducting air quality standards in Southern California to make sure that that the population is Southern California is not being exposed to the hundreds of airborne chemicals used by the U.S. Navy. U.S. Navy Southern California E.I.S. http://www.socalrangecomplexeis.com/Documents.aspx

A copy of the chemicals like red and white phosphorus, depleted uranium, CHAFF (aluminum coated fiberglass particulates), and other chemicals and particles have been used in the last year and continue to be used.

The U.S. Navy Environmental Impact Statement notes that experiments will be conducted over land areas as well as along the shorelines and over the Pacific Ocean (another 5-Year warfare program is scheduled to begin in 2010 once the E.I.S. is finalized in the summer of 2010 - www.nwtrangecomplexeis.com is the Navy E.I.S. for Northern California, Oregon, Washington and Idaho).

Top

March 15, 2010

SPECIAL SHOWING AT OLLI

“SKY LINES”

(Documentary Film)

Date: March 30, 2010 (Tuesday)

Time: 1 p.m. – 3 p.m.

Cost: $15

DAC: 093SNR855

Location: Contact OLLI for Class Registration and Location

Contact: OLLI – (530) 757-8777/(800) 752-0881 or www.extension.ucdavis.edu/olli

On Tuesday, March 30, 2010, Davis, CA based documentary filmmaker, Deborah J. Whitman, will show her documentary film “Sky Lines” at the Osher Lifelong Learning Institute (OLLI) – UC Davis Extension class.

The documentary covers controversial weather modification programs (man-made clouds/geo-engineering and the grass-roots movements in Northern California aimed at exposing this critical environmental issue. Following the film, Ms. Whitman, President of the nonprofit Environmental Voices, will answer questions on the impact of toxic chemicals on human health and how they are destroying our environment.

Please contact Deborah Whitman at (916) 595-7197 for additional information.

Top

I've got him!!! Michael J. Murphy will be my guest this Saturday, March 6th, from 6 to 8pm Pacific time. He'll be exposing the TRUTHS about "CHEMTRAILS" and what our government is in the business of of doing to U.S. Looks like they've finally discovered something they can do right and are VERY good at,,, KILLING U.S.!!!

Read his article here! What in the World Are They Spraying?

Here's some of his recent video's and contact information should you want to learn more:

Chemtrail video here

California Governor candidate Chelene Nightingale discusses NWO, CFR, Chemtrails and Bilderburg here

Mark Reed for Congress discusses Chemtrails during interview here

Mike Murphy interview Orange County Sherriff candidate Bill Hunt here

Mike Murphy interviews Stewart Rhodes founder of Oathkeepers here

Confrontation at Sen. Feinsteins's office here

Michael Murphy

(310) 431-8890

The American Reconstruction Project can still be listened to live from 6 to 8pm Pacific time at www.crusaderadio.com, but now you can also listen to it live, on-line at: www.talkshoe.com Use the pin number 74235. If you're using TalkShoe on line, you can also instant message me with questions or comments for David or myself. My show's are also being archive there, should you miss the live show and you want to check out any of my past episodes.

Remember this statement: When injustice Becomes law, rebellion Becomes duty!

My show: The American Reconstruction Project, Simply trying to return America to what our Forefathers tried to give U.S.

Hosted by: Jack Bauer

www.crusaderadio.com

Saturdays, from 6 to 9pm Pacific time, 9 to 11pm Eastern. For live and archived shows:

www.talkshoe.com

Phone Number: (724) 444-7444

Call ID: 74235

Top

February 7, 2010

DOCUMENTARY FILMMAKER AND PRESIDENT OF ENVIRONMENTAL VOICES TO SPEAK AT RALLY IN SAN DIEGO

Activists and Media Welcomed!

Date: February 20, 2010 (Saturday)

Time: 7:30 a.m.

Location: San Diego Convention Center

111 W. Harbor Drive

San Diego, CA

Information: Geoengineeringwatch.org

EnvironmentalVoices.org

youTube.com - Environmental Voices “Sky Lines”

On Saturday, February 20, 2010, Deborah J. Whitman, documentary filmmaker “Sky Lines” and President of Environmental Voices will be an invited guest speaker at a public rally at the AAAS Annual Meeting in San Diego, California where Geo-Engineering Scientists will be discussing "Can Geo-Engineering save us from Global Warming". Ms. Whitman will discuss the health and environmental affects of geo-engineering the weather using toxic chemicals in weather modification programs. Other guest speakers will be Dane Wigington, of NorCal Citizens for Clean Air, Dr. James Collins (Eco Psychologist) and others.

We encourage the public and media to attend this groundbreaking event.

Please contact Deborah Whitman at (916) 595-7197 for additional information.

Top

January 22, 2010

Soapbox TV Interviews

Event: Soapbox TV Interviews – Deborah J. Whitman and Allan Buckmann

Subject: Health and Environmental Affects of Geo-Engineering the Weather

Date: January 25, 2010 (Monday)

Channel: 17 (Sacramento, CA)

Broadcast Time: 8:00 p.m.

Rebroadcast Time: Wednesdays at 4:00 a.m.

Call In Number: (916) 456-5182

Website: www.soapboxTV.com, www.youtube.com/environmentalvoices

Environmental Voices Founder/President and Documentary Filmmaker, Deborah J. Whitman and retired California Fish and Game Biologist and President/COO of Microbetech, Allan Buckmann, will discuss the health and environmental hazards of geo-engineering. A four minute video clip of the documentary, “Sky Lines”, that features Allan Buckmann and was produced by Ms. Whitman, will be shown to the audience. The public is encouraged to call in their questions to (916) 456-5182.

Whitman will discuss health concerns of the these geo-engineering weather programs and Buckmann will discuss how these programs are affecting our forests.

Top

January 15, 2010

Fellow Activists and Citizens,

One of the most difficult campaigns EVER taken by activists is the process of educating the public about aerosol spraying, known to many of you as chemtrails. Over the years, the word chemtrails has come to be synonymous with "conspiracy" and "left wing propaganda".

But now mainstream media is attempting to inform the public that aerosol spraying is to begin, but using their term "GEO-ENGINEERING", more specifically, "Stratospheric Aerosol Spraying Geo-Engineering".

It is IMPERATIVE that all campaigns include, IF NOT SWITCH, to the politically correct term of Geo-Engineering. Chemtrails are GEO-ENGINEERING.

Think about the potential leap forward in progress if we point to the spraying and say.."That is the Geo-Engineering program". Specifically, that is the "Geo-Engineering Aerosol Spraying" Program.

We have just a short time, a month to a year to bring the entire population up to speed as scientists and government push forward. This is also the moment in history when the belly of this beast is most vulnerable. The government's credibility is most damaged as they attempt to bring to light their plans while hiding their past.

Please see our website geoengineeringwatch.org

Link to us.

Join us in San Diego (February, see the site) and in Monteray (March) as the Citizens get in the face of the scientists who willingly and blindly go along with the destruction of our environment.

Mauro Oliveira

Geoengineeringwatch.org

530 356 7343

Geo-Engineers Plan Climate Experiments

Top

Could a Ban of Transparent Reporting at the Asilomar Conference be an Attempt to Cover-Up World-Wide Contamination From Stratospheric Aerosol Geo-Engineering Programs?

By Michael J. Murphy

Geo-Engineers gathered once again in Pacific Grove, California at the Asilomar International Conference on Climate Intervention Technologies meeting to develop norms and guidelines for what they say will be “controlled experimentation” on geo-engineering the planet. While many claim that stratospheric aerosol geo- engineering (SAG), programs are in full- scale deployment, organizers of this meeting showed a lack of transparency by either denying or holding reporters to a high set of rules which limited what information was brought to the attention of the public. While we might never know how much information from the conference was suppressed in articles and reports, we do know some of the information that was not included. The issue of current SAG deployment and the use of aluminum in these programs seemed to be missing from reports and articles that came out of the conference.

Mauro Oliveira, webmaster of http: //www.geoengineeringwatch.org/ said that aluminum became a concern to many after the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting, February 18-22, 2010 in San Diego, CA, when independent journalists sent shockwaves around the world after breaking the story of scientists discussing the plausibility of spraying 10 to 20 megatons of aluminum into the sky in stratospheric aerosol geo-engineering (SAG) campaigns. Francis Mangels, a retired USDA/USFS biologist commented on the use of aluminum by saying, “although aluminum is an abundant element, it does not exist naturally in the environment in free form. Dispersing massive amounts of ultra-fine aluminum particulates as proposed by geo- engineers into the stratosphere would have unquantifiable human health and environmental impacts.” When scientists were asked about the risks associated with the use of aluminum sprayed as an aerosol in SAG programs, they admitted that they have only begun to research aluminum and have published nothing. They also admitted that something terrible could be found in the future that they don’t know about. Also, when asked about deployment of current programs, scientists denied that any SAG programs have been deployed. This contradicted the findings of many who claim that SAG programs are well underway and that high amounts of aluminum and other harmful substances from these programs are being found resulting in the devastation of ecosystems and the health of people around the world.

Like the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) meeting, the Asilomar geo- engineering conference hosted some of the world’s leading geo-engineers, environmental groups and scientists who gathered to discuss various issues relating to SAG. Unlike the AAAS meeting, reporters were either denied attendance or restricted by a strict set of rules, which included a ban on daily reporting, quoting, and recording anything from the meeting without the consent of presenters. Stewart Howe was one of the reporters denied access to the conference. Howe helped break the story about aluminum when he was sent to the AAAS meeting in San Diego to report for Infowars. He feels that he was denied access because of this and his reporting of evidence that suggests SAG programs are in full-scale deployment. Howe said, “due to the devastating effects of aluminum and world-wide claims of current deployment, transparent reporting of this could devastate the entire SAG agenda, compromising billions of dollars in contracts.” He went on to say that it was apparent that this meeting had no intentions of being transparent.

Whereas many reporters were denied access to this event, some “privileged” journalists did have the opportunity to attend. Although some of the articles about the conference appeared to be critical of geo-engineering, most largely ignored the use of aluminum and other serious issues that could have impacted or challenged the damaging components of the SAG agenda. By their compliance with the strict, non-transparent guidelines of the conference, the reporting journalists not only helped keep some of the meeting secret, they also helped hide the fact that geo-engineers are “planning” to use aluminum in SAG programs.

Some articles also falsely reported that geo-engineers are planning on using sulfur in the various SAG campaigns. This contradicts articles written by some reporters who attended the AAAS meeting and quoted scientists as stating that they initially considered using sulfur for the program; however, aluminum is more effective and will be the ingredient considered for use. To date, scientists have not corrected the journalists who falsely reported the use of less damaging sulfur instead of harmful aluminum as being an ingredient for SAG programs.

Let’s look at this issue a little more closely. People from around the world are witnessing white trails behind airplanes and believe them to be a product of SAG programs that scientists deny exist. People are also reporting test results of high amounts of aluminum, barium and strontium in their snow, rain and soil where the alleged spraying is occurring. These are the exact substances that scientists are “considering” implementing into the various SAG programs discussed at the AAAS meeting. Shockwaves were sent around the globe after the AAAS meeting because of reports that led many to believe that the destruction of ecosystems and the massive amounts of aluminum found in the snow, rain and soil are in fact from SAG programs which have already been deployed. As a result of these reports, many around the world are asking questions about the current deployment and the dangers of using aluminum in these programs. And finally, journalists are restricted from reporting certain facts from this conference that could be damaging to the SAG agenda.

Could transparent reporting of certain facts threaten the current and future deployment of SAG programs around the world? Could denying independent reporters the freedom to openly report on this meeting be an attempt to cover-up allegations that SAG programs are in full-scale deployment and are also destroying ecosystems around the world with the use of aluminum?

Is it possible that the reporters who were allowed into this meeting were invited for the purpose of protecting the corporate and political interests of those involved with SAG programs? What would the political and monetary implications be for those who have vested interests in SAG if the larger public was made aware of the multiple environmental and health effects of spraying megatons of aluminum into our environment?

Whatever the reason for this lack of transparency and denial of information, we the public need to hold both reporters and scientists to a higher degree of professionalism, transparency and ethical consideration when it comes to these and other issues of public interest. The future of our health and environment is dependent upon it.

GeoCon Field Report

Top

by Stewart Howe

The American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) held its annual meeting this past 18-22 February 2010.

Stewart Howe went to cover the four days of geoengineering (GE) symposia and Saturdays protest, on site at the San Diego CA Convention Center. The worlds leading geoengineering scientists, including Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) and Club of Rome panel members were in attendance. The most current proposed and considered climate intervention technology (CIT) was discussed. At least those not below radar in the hands of covert operations and distanced by compartmentalization from these scientists apparently confined to theoretical development rather than current aerosol deployment.

The Field Report is a glimpse behind the scenes, as well as out front, in the streets surrounding GeoCon 2010.

Several admissions and alarming statements were made in regards to potential harm, unelected (UN) global governance oversight, and concern about weaponization of CIT . It was admitted that GE has already been deployed in our oceans with "Iron enrichment/fertilization" operations. Also noteworthy and commendable was Professor David Keith's (IPCC, Club of Rome) willingness to come out and initiate open and candid conversation with protesters and concerned citizens. His closing statement to the crowd surrounding him was unexpected and encouraging. Quite a bit of inside footage has been made available for an upcoming documentary film on the subject, now in production. Stay tuned, this is sure to unfold into an astounding story.

view the youTube video here:

Where in the World is the Canary?

Top

The Canary flew South to get some sunshine. Can you guess from these photographs where she has been?

2-14-10 - If you guessed Carmel, CA area you were correct. While on the beach she noticed sky lines and silver-white haze in the sky over Carmel, Monterey and Pebble Beach Golf Course and Big Sur. It was the final day of the AT&T Golf Tournament. For more information about these geo-engineering weather programs and the rally in San Diego on 2-20-10, please visit Geoengineeringwatch.org.

2-15-10 - The Canary flew further down South and guess what she saw in the Santa Barbara area? If you guessed more of the same, you were correct and won the Tweetie Prize.

2-16-10 - TOXIC Los Angeles,CA. Yes, The Canary almost landed in Emergency after traveling up and down Wilshire Blvd. during heavy traffic and heavy aerosol spraying in Los Angeles. Downtown LA is not where you want to be if you want a healthy immune system. Carbon monoxide stays in the blood hemoglobin over 250 times longer than oxygen. If your body can't get rid if it fast enough, you are in big trouble. The Canaries in the coal mines would die from too much carbon monoxide. This Canary has had many more than 9 lives. The Canary recovered once again by driving to the ocean and getting away from the toxic chemicals, getting rest, drinking lots of filtered water, taking multi-vitamins.

2-17-10 The Canary made it to Sunny San Diego. She decided to nest at a major hotel but they are heating with gas which makes her not feel very good. She decided to go to a very nice restaurant for dinner and had to move to a different table because they sat her next to a gas stove where they were cooking. Gas is toxic and makes The Canary very sick. It's not good for anyone who breathes it.

Sorry for all the bad news. There is some good news. The Canary isn't dead yet!!!!

Background Information about the Canary

They call me "The Canary" because like the canaries that were used in coal mining I can detect toxic chemicals in the environment. Canaries were once regularly used in coal mining as an early warning system. Toxic gases such as carbon monoxide and methane in the mine would kill the bird before affecting the miners.

I will be traveling and sending photographs/stories about toxic chemicals that I see in the environment in an effort to bring an awareness about how TOXIC our world is and how these toxic chemicals are affecting our health and the environment.

The Canary flew the coop. WHERE IN THE WORLD IS THE CANARY?

February 10, 2010, Davis, CA - Geo-engineering weather programs were being conducted over Davis on the day that The Canary made a presentation to the California EPA - Air Resources Board about the dangers of the toxic chemicals used in these programs to our health and the environment. Reports of aerosol spraying came from other California locations (Redding/Napa/LA) on this day. Visit environmentalvoices.org and geoengineeringwatch.org for more information about these deadly programs and how to protect your health.

February 12, 2010, Sacramento, CA (Arden Fair) - The Canary was in Roseville, CA around 3:30 p.m. when she first saw the aerosol spraying begin. Her eyes began to burn and she had shortness of breath. Jet's continued to aerosol spray sky lines, man-made clouds and silver/white haze as she drove to Sacramento. This photograph was taken on Arden Way in Sacramento at 5:00 p.m.

February 12, 2010, Chuck E Cheese - The Canary was with family at Chuck E Cheese and got sick from the gas used to bake pizza. Gas is TOXIC!

Top

How You Can Help

• Donate Now!

Find out what your money will go towards by supporting us

• Join Now!

Become a member of Environmental Voices

• Take Action Now!

Help Sponsor our cause

Newsletter Signup

Get updates on our actions

click here to sign up

No Life on Earth PSA

What on Earth are they Spraying?

US Navy Warfare Testing

Kevin Costner Testifies on Capitol Hill